TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

H. N. Rodgers Sons Company v. Nelson

H. N. Rodgers & Sons Company v. Nelson

H. N. Rodgers Sons Co. v. Nelson, 192 S.W.2d 972 (Ark. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 4, 1946
Docket
No. 4-7793
Judges
Smith
Citations
192 S.W.2d 972209 Ark. 8661946 Ark. LEXIS 494

Opinion of the Court — Smith

Grifein Smith, Chief Justice.

Circuit Court affirmed Workmen’s Compensation Commission in awarding $7.55 per week during dependency (and certain incidental sums). The appeal questions Gracy Nelson’s right to collect any sum, contention being that she was supported by her husband. Will, seventeen years of age, was burned to death in December, 1943, while engaged in the Company’s service, etc.

There was testimony that McKinley Nelson, the decedent’s step-father, supported his wife, and efforts were made to show that any money given Gracy by her son was a gratuity. On the other hand, there was evidence that Will had for some time made material contributions to his mother and that to a certain extent she relied upon his efforts. The Commission found that necessary elements of support existed. We are not able to say there was no substantial testimony to support this factual finding.

In its conclusions of law the Commission employed these expressions: “At the time of [Will Curley’s] accidental death his mother was dependent upon him within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as no distinction is made as to total or partial dependency. ”

In Arthur Murray Company, Inc., v. Cole, ante, p. 61, 189 S. W. 2d 614 , we said:

“The appeal is controlled by Crossett Lumber Company v. Johnson, 208 Ark. 572 , 187 S. W. 2d 161 . It was there held that ‘dependent,’ within the meaning of Act 319, is to be distinguished from ‘wholly dependent.’ One is dependent if he or she relies partially upon contributions of a person whose aid contributes a material element in the claimant’s support.”

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 11951: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton52 So. 2d 634 (Miss. 1951)
  2. E. H. Noel Coal Company v. Grilc221 S.W.2d 49 (Ark. 1949)

Most recent

  1. Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton52 So. 2d 634 (Miss. 1951)
  2. E. H. Noel Coal Company v. Grilc221 S.W.2d 49 (Ark. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Crossett Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 187 S.W.2d 161 (Ark. 1945) 13
Arthur Murray Co. v. Cole, 189 S.W.2d 614 (Ark. 1945) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list