TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Cinnamond

In the Matter of the Application of John S. Cinnamond for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

In re Cinnamond, 5 P.2d 928 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 7, 1931
Docket
No. 1647.
Citations
5 P.2d 928119 Cal. App. 561931 Cal. App. LEXIS 120

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [1] Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. ( Goodrich v. Superior Court, 92 Cal.App. 695 [ 268 P. 669 ]; Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [ 297 P. 566 ].) *Page 57

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Oxman223 P.2d 66 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)

Most recent

  1. In re Oxman223 P.2d 66 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Goodrich v. Superior Court, 268 P. 669 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928) 7
Brune v. Superior Court, 297 P. 566 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list