City of Los Angeles v. Nash
City of Los Angeles (A Municipal Corporation) v. Harry B. Nash, Defendants James L. Clarke
City of Los Angeles v. Nash, 299 P. 813 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Opinion of the Court
[1] This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs, in which all the material facts and questions of law are identical with those of City of Los Angeles v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, Julia Fanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [ 299 P. 807 ], this day decided. The same disposition should be made of the instant case.
Order affirmed.
Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred. *Page 759
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.