Marston v. Kuhland
MARY A. MARSTON, Appellant, v. LOUIS KUHLAND, Respondent
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This is an action for the enforcement of a trust and for an accounting. The appeal is taken directly to this court. By section 4, article VI, of the constitution of the state, “appellate jurisdiction on appeal from the superior courts in all cases in equity, except such as arise in justice’s courts,” is given to the supreme court. By the same section *317 and article of the constitution it is provided that “no appeal taken to the supreme or to a district court of appeal shall be dismissed for the reason only that the same was not taken to the proper court, but the cause shall be transferred to the proper court upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as may be just, and shall be proceeded with therein as if regularly appealed to.”
In perfecting the appeal, these provisions of the constitution were doubtless overlooked by appellant. When the cause was argued and submitted here it was assumed by the court that it was here by order of reference of the supreme court, the notice of appeal not having been called to our attention. The case is clearly one “in equity” and is appealable only to the supreme court, which alone has jurisdiction in the first instance.
The order of submission heretofore given and made is vacated and the cause transferred to the supreme court; the costs to attend its final determination.
McLaughlin, J., and Buckles, J., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.