TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Application of Worthington

In the Matter of the Application of George Worthington for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

In re Application of Worthington, 132 P. 82 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 17, 1913
Docket
No. Crim. No. 284.
Judges
THE COURT. —
Citations
132 P. 8221 Cal. App. 4971913 Cal. App. LEXIS 285
Cited by 7

Opinion of the Court

It appearing to the court that the act which petitioner is charged with having violated is one entitled, an act governing the use of automobiles upon public highways, and it not being averred in the complaint that the defendant used or operated his automobile upon a public highway, the complaint failed to state any public offense, and for that reason it is ordered that petitioner be discharged, and that the money deposited in lieu of bail be returned. *Page 498

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1919: 11923: 11933: 21936: 11939: 11966: 119192026peak 1933 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Stansberry242 Cal. App. 2d 199 (1966)
  2. In re Hernandez220 P. 423 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
  3. Dorris v. McKamy180 P. 645 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  4. People v. Knight96 P.2d 173 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
  5. People v. Hoenschle22 P.2d 777 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
  6. State ex rel. Callahan v. Second Judicial District Court18 P.2d 449 (Nev. 1933)

Most recent

  1. People v. Stansberry242 Cal. App. 2d 199 (1966)
  2. People v. Knight96 P.2d 173 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
  3. People v. Stanley57 P.2d 146 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
  4. People v. Hoenschle22 P.2d 777 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
  5. State ex rel. Callahan v. Second Judicial District Court18 P.2d 449 (Nev. 1933)
  6. In re Hernandez220 P. 423 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list