TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Uniroyal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

UNIROYAL, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 519 F.2d 1342 (6th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 16, 1975
Docket
No. 74-2111
Judges
Phillips, Celebrezze, Peck
Citations
519 F.2d 134290 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 29411975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14191

Opinion

ORDER There is before the Court for consideration a petition for review and cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board which was issued August 23, 1974, and is reported at 213 NLRB No. 7 . The unfair labor practices occurred at Oxford, Connecticut, where the petitioner maintains and operates the Waterbury-Oxford Airport. As is not infrequently the case, we are confronted with a situation in which the administrative law judge chose to discredit the testimony of the witnesses for the petitioner and to credit those of the Union, but in the present instance he did not indicate the basis of the credibility determination as being the demeanor of the witnesses, their interest in the subject matter of the litigation, their manner of testifying, or otherwise. The Board approved and adopted the findings without comment in this regard. On such a state of the record, petitioner urges that the logic of the testimony should be the controlling factor in determining credibility, and that based thereon the petition should be granted. However, we conclude that it cannot be said that there is not sufficient testimony in the record to support the findings of fact, Universal Camera Corp.

v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Accordingly, It is ordered that the order of the Board be and it hereby is enforced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1998: 119982026peak 1998 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (1951) 7,362

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list