TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

Dr. Helen BRUCE Et Al., Appellants, v. R. Elliott SCEARCE Et Al., Appellees

Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce, 521 F.2d 796 (8th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 16, 1975
Docket
No. 75-1225
Judges
Heaney, Stephenson, Smith
Citations
521 F.2d 7961975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McCorkle v. United States559 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1977)

Most recent

  1. McCorkle v. United States559 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F. Supp. 297 (E.D. Mo. 1975) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list