TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt

Benjamin Franklin Bond Indemnity Corporation (A Corporation) v. Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge of the Superior Court, Etc.

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt, 22 P.2d 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 16, 1933
Docket
No. 8881.
Judges
WORKS, P.J.
Citations
22 P.2d 26132 Cal. App. 391933 Cal. App. LEXIS 240

Opinion of the Court

[1] The writ of review was improperly issued in this proceeding. After return made to the writ our attention is first called in the briefs to the fact that the petition for the writ was unverified. The writ of review can be issued only upon a verified petition. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1069.)

[2] As we have so often said under similar circumstances, respondent judge is not a proper party to the proceeding.

The writ and the accompanying restraining order are set aside and the proceeding is dismissed.

Stephens, J., and Parker, J., pro tem., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 11975: 21985: 119482026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. Cooper534 P.2d 403 (Cal. 1975)
  2. Neblett v. Superior Court194 P.2d 22 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
  3. United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board694 P.2d 138 (Cal. 1985)
  4. Franchise Tax Board v. Municipal Court45 Cal. App. 3d 377 (1975)

Most recent

  1. United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board694 P.2d 138 (Cal. 1985)
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. Cooper534 P.2d 403 (Cal. 1975)
  3. Franchise Tax Board v. Municipal Court45 Cal. App. 3d 377 (1975)
  4. Neblett v. Superior Court194 P.2d 22 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list