Esaisa v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
Albert Esaisa, Etc. v. the Superior Court of Sonoma County
Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been determined by the *Page 797 defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner. [1] The questions raised have all been disposed of in a case from the county of Napa, California, involving precisely the same legal situation, which case has been this day decided by this court. ( Wheatley v. Superior Court et al. [S.F. No. 13281 of the records of this court], ante, p. 722 [ 279 P. 989 ].)
For the reasons stated in the case last cited, the proceedings are affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.