Hutt v. Corser
Pearl Hutt v. J.W. Corser
Hutt v. Corser, 20 P.2d 327 (Cal. 1933)
Opinion of the Court
[1] Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent's claims.
The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C.J., concurred. *Page 607
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.