TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Kehr

In the Matter of the Application of Thomas J. Kehr for Writ of Mandamus.

In re Kehr, 212 P. 913 (Cal. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 13, 1923
Docket
No. S. F. No. 10573.
Judges
THE COURT.
Citations
212 P. 913190 Cal. 4011923 Cal. LEXIS 539

Opinion of the Court

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner's remedy is by proceeding in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).

All the Justices concurred. *Page 402

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 11952: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gantner & Mattern Co. v. California Employment Commission109 P.2d 932 (Cal. 1941)
  2. Marshall v. State241 P.2d 621 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Marshall v. State241 P.2d 621 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)
  2. Gantner & Mattern Co. v. California Employment Commission109 P.2d 932 (Cal. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list