TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Federal-Mogul Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Fed.-Mogul Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 524 F.2d 37 (6th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 13, 1975
Docket
No. 74-2178
Judges
Edwards, Peck, McCree
Citations
524 F.2d 3791 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 22071975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12407

Opinion

ORDER Petitioner seeks review (and the Board by cross-application seeks enforcement) of an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring Federal-Mogul to rehire certain former employees who had been discharged as a result of a strike found by the Board to have been an unfair labor practice strike. The Board’s order is reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No. 141.

The majority of the Board found, we believe on substantial evidence on the whole record, that the company had refused to bargain in good faith. During over ten months of bargaining, beginning August 23, 1972, the company never made any economic offer of any kind. Its first economic proposals came July 11, 1973, 42 days after the strike occurred, and then its proposals were withdrawn after five days. The union, which had been certified as bargaining agent before negotiations began, had opened the negotiations by stating all of its economic demands except wages. Nonetheless, for a substantial time the union acquiesced in the company’s demand to settle noneconomic issues first. In the weeks immediately before the strike, however, the union made a wage proposal and, unsuccessfully, sought economic proposals from the company.

The order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11981: 12000: 219802026peak 2000 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list