Estate of Cheda
In the Matter of the Estate of SILVIS H. CHEDA, Deceased. GEORGE A. CHEDA, Etc., Appellant, v. ELENORE A. CHEDA, Respondent
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Motion to dismiss appeal from order on ground that the same is not an appealable order.
The order was one made by the superior court under section 1597 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the executors to transfer and deliver to a third party certain assets of the estate, being certain shares of bank stock. The application for the order and the order were based on a contract for the sale thereof alleged to have been made by the deceased.
[1]
The claim that the order is nonappealable is based on the fact that such an order is not specified as an appeal-able order in the statute specifying the probate judgments and orders from which an appeal may be taken. (Code Civ.
*323 Proc., subd. 3, sec. 963.) If the order here were exclusively a probate order there would be much force in the claim.
[2]
We are of opinion, however, that the proceeding authorized by section 1597 et seq. is in substance more than, this, being practically a proceeding in equity terminating in a final judgment, having the full force and effect of a final judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract. As such we deem the order made therein a final judgment, appealable under subdivision 1 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It was for this reason that the motion to dismiss the appeal was denied from the bench.
Angellotti, C. J., Wilbur, J., Shaw, J., Sloane, J;, Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.