TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bettie Neale v. Frank Goldberg and Earl M. Robins

Bettie NEALE, Appellant, v. Frank GOLDBERG and Earl M. Robins, Appellees

Bettie Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332 (9th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 3, 1975
Docket
No. 74--1567
Judges
Browning, Ely, Per Curiam, Sharp
Citations
525 F.2d 332

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION Before BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SHARP, District Judge.

* PER CURIAM:

We have concluded that the District Court’s summary judgment must be affirmed because the prior state court proceedings were res judicata as to all issues presented by the complaint in the District Court.

Francisco Enterprises, Inc. v. Kirby, 482 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973). Appellant argues that the state court granted a declaratory judgment and that, under California law, a declaratory judgment is not res judicata as to subsequent proceedings. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738 , which requires federal courts to give state judgments the “same full faith and credit” the judgments would be given in the jurisdiction of their rendition, this court is obliged to apply California’s law of res judicata. See 88 Harv.L.Rev. 453, 455-56 & n.16 (1974). And the California court’s ruling cannot accurately be characterized as merely a declaratory judgment. The dispute had “crystallized into a cause of action for past wrongs,”

Travers v. Louden, 254 Cal.App.2d 926 , 62 Cal.Rptr. 654, 656 (1967), and the state court’s judgment provided for relief in addition to a simple declaration of the rights of the parties.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 21979: 21980: 11982: 11983: 11990: 119772026peak 1977 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Travers v. Louden, 254 Cal. App. 2d 926 (1967) 26
Francisco Enters. v. Kirby, 482 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973) 25

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list