TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Harold Lester Jackson and Jerry Wayne Jackson

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Lester JACKSON and Jerry Wayne Jackson, Defendants-Appellants

United States v. Jackson, 525 F.2d 1025 (6th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 17, 1975
Docket
No. 75--1529
Judges
Edwards, Peck, McAllister
Citations
525 F.2d 10251975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11896

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The two appellants in this case were convicted on two counts of possessing sawed-off shotguns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d), 5871, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1970).

On inspection of the files, records, and consideration of the oral argument in this case, we conclude that the Knoxville police who stopped and searched the car in which the Jacksons were arrested, and in which two sawed-off shotguns were found, had probable cause to make the stop and the search involved.

Previously the Knoxville police department had received a telephone call from a Mike Lewellyn in which he stated that there was a car in his driveway with a Georgia license, “and they said they had guns and they wouldn’t leave the driveway.” Two officers thereupon responded and talked with Debbie Lewellyn. Thereafter one of the officers, who testified at trial, said that he put out through the police radio an order to pick up a green Chevy Camaro with a black hood, containing four males who had some “sawed-off shotguns” and who were heading toward Tyson Park. Another Knoxville police officer saw the car described at the location referred to, and joined by another officer, made the stop and search.

We agree with the District Court that there was probable cause to believe a felony was being committed prior to the stop and search concerned, and that there was ample evidence to support the possession and aiding and abetting counts.

Finding no reversible error in the Judge’s rulings on evidence or pretrial motions, the judgments of conviction are affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Harold David Jordon530 F.2d 722 (6th Cir. 1976)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Harold David Jordon530 F.2d 722 (6th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list