United States v. Jimmy Lee Eng, in Re Jeremiah Casselman
Opinion
527 F.2d 611
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy Lee ENG, Defendant-Appellant. In re Jeremiah CASSELMAN.
No. 75--1444.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 15, 1976.
ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY AND REMOVING COUNSEL 1
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.
2
Jeremiah Casselman is removed as counsel for appellant. Another will be appointed in his stead.
3
For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, the following penalty is assessed:
4
Casselman will pay, personally and directly, to the court reporter or reporters the entire cost of the transcript of evidence in this case. This is to be paid within 14 days of the date of the filing of this order. A receipt or receipts for payment will be forwarded to the clerk of this court.
5
It is noted that the trial consumed about five days and the penalty will be substantial, but the failure was aggravated.
6
Order modified 530 F.2d 321 .
* The Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.