TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fry v. Ritch

Margaurite Fry vs. Henry M. Ritch Et Als.

Fry v. Ritch, 138 A. 138 (Conn. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 28, 1927
Judges
Banks, Haines, Hinman, Maltbie, Wheeler
Citations
138 A. 138106 Conn. 7301927 Conn. LEXIS 173

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This case was tried in connection with the companion case of Fry v. Taylor, ante, p. 387. The assault and battery for which plaintiff seeks to recover damages is alleged to have occurred in the course of the dispossession of the plaintiff described in the companion case. The trial court has found the facts adversely to the plaintiff’s claims. The finding was not made without evidence, but on conflicting evidence. The corrections sought in the appeal cannot, under our rules, be made. Aside from the claimed corrections, there is no question of law properly raised on the appeal.

There is no error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list