TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Curry v. Jockmus

Whitney Curry Et Al. vs. Charles H. Jockmus

Curry v. Jockmus, 138 A. 809 (Conn. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 5, 1927
Judges
Wheeler, Maltbie, Haines, Hinman, Avert
Citations
138 A. 809106 Conn. 697

Opinion of the Court — Wheeler

Wheeler, C. J.

This ease involves the same questions as its companion case, Tuttle v. Jockmus, ante, p. 683. The only difference is in the acceleration clause which in this case reads, “and if default shall be made in the payment of any one of said notes at the time of its maturity, or of the interest due on said notes.” The defendant does not demur for uncertainty, as in the companion case, “but only because such clause does not appear in the notes.” The opinion in the Tuttle case determines this case.

There is error, the judgment is set aside tod the cause remanded to be proceeded with according to law.

In this opinion the other judges concurred, except Maltbie and Hinman, Js., who dissented.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list