TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Aston Motor Car Co. v. Mannion

The Aston Motor Car Company v. Thomas Mannion.

Aston Motor Car Co. v. Mannion, 103 A. 655 (Conn. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 8, 1918
Judges
Prentice, Roraback, Wheeler, Beach, Shumway
Citations
103 A. 65592 Conn. 5681918 Conn. LEXIS 70
Disposition
No error.
Headnotes
A re-enactment of certain portions only of an existing statute, in an amending Act which purports to be a substitute for the former, effectually repeals the provisions of the original Act which are omitted from the substitute. The right of appeal from the City Court of Bridgeport to the Court of Common Pleas, given by § 119 of the city charter (15 Special Laws, p. 493), was repealed by the omission of that provision from the Act of 1917 (17 Special Laws, p. 1005) amending that section of the charter.
Summary
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Booth, J., erasing from the docket for want of jurisdiction an appeal to that court by the defendant from an adverse judgment of the City Court of Bridgeport. Section 119 of the charter of the City of Bridgeport, as revised in 1907 (15 Special Laws, p. 493), provided for the existence of a City Court, fixed its jurisdiction, prescribed its procedure, and defined the rights of the parties litigant therein. Among other things it provided that an appeal might be taken to the Court of Common Pleas for Fairfield County, at its next return day, from any judgment or decree of the court except one following a jury trial. In this particular the charter remained unchanged until the 1917 session of the General Assembly. At that session § 119 was amended to read as recited in the amending Act. In its amended form that portion of the original section above referred to, which gave the right of appeal from a judgment or decree rendered, was entirely eliminated and no provision authorizing such appeal appears in it. This amendment took effect before the present attempt to take an appeal was made.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The amendment of 1917 substituted § 119, as therein recited, for the section as it had previously existed. Those portions of the original section which were omitted from the section in its new form, ceased to be the law and were as effectually repealed as it was possible to accomplish a repeal. The defendant’s attempted appeal was, therefore, without authority, and conferred upon the Court of Common Pleas no jurisdiction over the case.

There is no error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11945: 11973: 11978: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Menzies v. Fisher334 A.2d 452 (Conn. 1973)
  2. Simborski v. Wheeler183 A. 688 (Conn. 1936)
  3. Anastasio v. Gulf Oil Corporation42 A.2d 149 (Conn. 1945)
  4. Grogan v. City of New Britain397 A.2d 97 (Conn. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Grogan v. City of New Britain397 A.2d 97 (Conn. 1978)
  2. Menzies v. Fisher334 A.2d 452 (Conn. 1973)
  3. Anastasio v. Gulf Oil Corporation42 A.2d 149 (Conn. 1945)
  4. Simborski v. Wheeler183 A. 688 (Conn. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list