TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

MacDonald v. Newman

Hugh Glenn MacDonald vs. Samuel S. Newman Et Al.

MacDonald v. Newman, 154 A. 259 (Conn. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 6, 1931
Judges
Mabtbie, Haines, Hinman, Banks, Avert
Citations
154 A. 259113 Conn. 7561931 Conn. LEXIS 163

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The only issue upon this appeal is as to the effectiveness under the applicable constitutional limitation of the statute, Public Acts of 1925, Chapter 122, now General Statutes, § 5473, to confer jurisdiction upon our courts over a nonresident automobilist using the highways of this State. It is therefore ruled by our decision in Hartley v. Vitiello, ante, p. 74, 154 Atl. 255 .

There is no error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Medeiros v. Kaye331 A.2d 351 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Medeiros v. Kaye331 A.2d 351 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hartley v. Vitiello, 154 A. 255 (Conn. 1931) 95

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list