TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Warren Wells v. South Main Bank

Warren WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH MAIN BANK Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Wells v. South Main Bank, 532 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 3, 1976
Docket
No. 75-3348
Judges
Ainsworth, Clark, Per Curiam, Ro-Ney
Citations
532 F.2d 100521 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 12611976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8736

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Warren Wells initiated suit against South Main Bank on November 2, 1971, alleging violations of federal securities laws in connection with a $260,000 loan made by South Main to Wells. On March 9, 1973, the district court ordered this suit consolidated with a similar suit filed by Wells against Spring Woods Bank. Wells sought leave to file a second amended petition on March 11, 1974, advancing additional claims against South Main Bank and to join First City National Bank of Houston and its attorneys *1006 as defendants. This motion and subsequent motions to reconsider were denied by the district court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeals may be taken to this court only from final decisions, subject to certain exceptions carefully enunciated in the statutes, court rules, and cases construing them.

See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291-92 (1970); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54. Denial of leave to amend pleadings is ordinarily not final for purposes of appeal.

See, e. g., Horner v. Ferron, 362 F.2d 224, 230 (9th Cir. 1966);

De-Nubilo v. United States, 343 F.2d 455, 456-57 (2d Cir. 1965);

cf. Jones v. Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090, 1095 (5th Cir. 1975). The right which Wells seeks to assert is neither separable from and collateral to the rights asserted in his suit against South Main Bank nor so independent of the main cause of action as to require immediate appellate treatment. Therefore, the exception to the finality rule enunciated in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949) is not applicable.

DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1976: 11979: 11980: 11981: 21982: 11984: 11987: 11989: 21996: 21999: 12010: 12019: 12024: 219762026peak 1981 · 2

Most recent

  1. DeAndre Currington v. Commander JuneauNo. 24-13183 (11th Cir. Dec. 26, 2024)
  2. Philippe Zatta v. SCI Technology IncNo. 24-10837 (11th Cir. Apr. 26, 2024)
  3. Carolyn Dawson v. The Bank of New York Mellon, etNo. 18-20657 (5th Cir. Apr. 5, 2019)
  4. Sharlyn Bertrand v. Greg Fischer399 F. App'x 857 (5th Cir. 2010)
  5. Mosley v. JohnsonNo. 99-10152 (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 1999)
  6. PYCA Industries, Inc v. Harrison Cty WasteNo. 94-60800 (5th Cir. May 3, 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 8,958
Jones v. Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090 (5th Cir. 1975) 188
Horner v. Ferron, 362 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1966) 47
Rocco & Anthony Denubilo v. United States, 343 F.2d 455 (2d Cir. 1965) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list