TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jimmy Frank Murphy, Bankrupt. Jimmy Frank Murphy v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service

In the Matter of Jimmy Frank Murphy, Bankrupt. Jimmy Frank MURPHY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee

Murphy v. United States Internal Revenue Serv., 533 F.2d 941 (5th Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 18, 1976
Docket
No. 74-4143
Judges
Ainsworth, Morgan, Per Curiam, Roney
Citations
533 F.2d 9418 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 77638 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 53401976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8464

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

In this case the district court reversed a bankruptcy judge’s determination that a 100 percent penalty tax for withholding and F.I.C.A. taxes assessed against a responsible corporate officer, 26 U.S.C.A. § 6672 was a dischargeable debt, the collection of which was barred by the discharge granted to the officer in his personal bankruptcy proceeding. Having been adjudicated a bankrupt and released from all his dischargeable debts, the bankrupt filed an application seeking a determination of the discharge-ability of the tax assessments made against him. The bankrupt’s appeal from the adverse decision of the district court raises two issues of law:

first, does the bankruptcy court have jurisdiction to determine the dischargeability of tax liability where the United States did not file a proof of claim in the bankruptcy proceeding, and second, *942 did the district court correctly hold that'the tax liability of the bankrupt was not dis-chargeable in bankruptcy?

Jurisdiction is established by 1966 and 1970 amendments to the bankruptcy laws. 11 U.S.C.A. §§ ll(a)(2A) and 35(c). This Court has noted that the language of 11 U.S.C.A. § ll(a)(2A) conflicts with the report of the Senate Finance Committee.

In re Statmaster Corp., 465 F.2d 978, 979-981 (5th Cir. 1972).

See In re Durensky, 519 F.2d 1024 , 1025 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1975). In adhering to the language of the statute, we adopt the reasoning of Judge Mahon stated in his thorough opinion on the same issue in another case.

In re Durensky, 377 F.Supp. 798 (N.D.Tex.1974), appeal dismissed, 519 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir. 1975). Our holding follows that of the Ninth Circuit where the Court stated:

We hold that the Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction under § 35(a) and (c) to adjudicate the Bankrupt’s indebtedness for the federal income taxes due and owing by the Bankrupt, as determined under § ll(a)(2A), to be discharged in bankruptcy, notwithstanding the lack of a prior claim therefor or other proof thereof by IRS.

Gwilliam v. United States, 519 F.2d 407, 412 (9th Cir. 1975).

See Bostwick v. United States, 521 F.2d 741 (8th Cir. 1975);

In re Century Vault Co., 416 F.2d 1035 (3d Cir. 1969):

As to the second issue, we adopt the reasoning of Judge Allgood given in this instant case, where the court determined that the 26 U.S.C.A. § 6672 liability is, for purposes of the bankruptcy law, a nondischargeable tax governed by 11 U.S.C.A. § 35 (a) rather than a dischargeable penalty which is governed by 11 U.S.C.A. § 93 (j).

In re Murphy, 381 F.Supp. 813 (N.D.Ala. 1974).

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 31978: 119772026peak 1977 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Sotelo436 U.S. 268 (1978)
  2. Tatum v. Commissioner69 T.C. 81 (Tax Ct. 1977)
  3. In re Onofre J. Sotelo and Naomi Sotelo, Bankrupts551 F.2d 1090 (7th Cir. 1977)
  4. Severance v. United States437 F. Supp. 5 (N.D. Tex. 1977)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Sotelo436 U.S. 268 (1978)
  2. Tatum v. Commissioner69 T.C. 81 (Tax Ct. 1977)
  3. In re Onofre J. Sotelo and Naomi Sotelo, Bankrupts551 F.2d 1090 (7th Cir. 1977)
  4. Severance v. United States437 F. Supp. 5 (N.D. Tex. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Durensky v. Durensky, 519 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir. 1975) 65
Bostwick v. United States, 521 F.2d 741 (8th Cir. 1975) 97
Gwilliam v. United States, 519 F.2d 407 (9th Cir. 1975) 55
In re Century Vault Co., Inc., Bankrupt, Harold J. Connor, Tr. in Bankr., 416 F.2d 1035 (3d Cir. 1969) 44
Statmaster Corp., Bankrupt. Larry Gilbert v. United States, 465 F.2d 978 (5th Cir. 1972) 23
In re Durensky, 377 F. Supp. 798 (N.D. Tex. 1974) 23
In re Murphy, 381 F. Supp. 813 (N.D. Ala. 1974) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list