TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and St. Leo's Parish, as Joint Operators Ofst. Leo's School

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn & St. Leo's Parish, as Joint Operators Ofst. Leo's Sch., 535 F.2d 1387 (2d Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 4, 1976
Docket
No. 1114
Citations
535 F.2d 138792 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 30521976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8700

Opinion

535 F.2d 1387 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3052

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN and St. Leo's Parish, as Joint Operators ofSt. Leo's School, Respondents.

No. 1114, Docket 76-4021.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1976. Decided June 4, 1976.

John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D. C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.

James A. Flynn, New York City (Jacob Silverman, Lorenz, Finn, Giardino & Lambos, New York City, on the brief), for respondents.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, CLARK, Associate Justice, * and TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

In opposing this petition for enforcement, the respondents contend, inter alia, that the Board lacked jurisdiction over them under 29 U.S.C. § 160 (a). It is conceded that St. Leo's Parish does not have a sufficient impact on commerce to meet the Board's jurisdictional prerequisites. Nevertheless, the Board asserted jurisdiction on the ground that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, over which the Board admittedly has jurisdiction, is a joint employer of the lay teachers in St. Leo's School.

2

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Administrative Law Judge, as modified by the opinion of the Board, --- N.L.R.B. --- (1975), we conclude that the Board's jurisdictional finding was proper and that respondents' other arguments are without merit. Accordingly, we enforce the Board's order in its entirety.

* United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 119952026peak 1995 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gargano v. Diocese of Rockville Centre888 F. Supp. 1274 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Gargano v. Diocese of Rockville Centre888 F. Supp. 1274 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list