TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paul Davis, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Richard Davis, Deceased v. United States

Paul DAVIS, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Richard Davis, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Davis v. United States, 536 F.2d 758 (8th Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 2, 1976
Docket
No. 75-1691
Judges
Webster, Henley, Smith
Citations
536 F.2d 7584 OSHC (BNA) 14174 BNA OSHC 14171976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8771

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant herein and plaintiff below, Paul Davis, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Richard Davis, Deceased, appeals from the dismissal of his suit brought in the *759 District of Nebraska against the United States under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 , for the decedent’s wrongful death. Decedent was killed on June 28, 1972 at a construction site when the sides of a trench in which he was working caved in. Plaintiff alleged that decedent’s death was proximately caused by the negligence of an employee of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), who, on June 9,1972, had inspected the construction site, had issued a “Citation for Serious Violation” to the contractor ordering correction of dangerous conditions of the trench, and who had negligently failed to arrange for or make a follow-up inspection to determine whether corrective measures had been taken or to take appropriate action to close down the trench.

Considering sua sponte whether the complaint stated a cause of action for which a private person would be liable under Nebraska law, 1

the district court 2

dismissed the complaint for want of jurisdiction on grounds that the duties required of OSHA officers are federally imposed and have no counterparts cognizable under Nebraska law. This holding is consistent with authority interpreting the scope of the Act to be limited to “ordinary common-law tort” claims.

United States v. Smith, 324 F.2d 622, 625 (5th Cir. 1963), citing Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15, 28 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953). We affirm on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of the district court.

The government urges as an independent basis for affirmance the “discretionary function” exception to claims filed pursuant to the Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (a), but in view of our disposition of the case on other jurisdictional grounds, it is unnecessary to reach this issue.

As stated, the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed.

1

. The Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 , reads in part:

(b) . the district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions on claims against the United States . . for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.

2

. The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, Chief Judge, District of Nebraska.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1976: 11978: 41979: 71980: 31981: 21982: 21983: 11996: 12003: 119762026peak 1979 · 7

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United Scottish Insurance Company v. United States of America, Kathleen M614 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1980)
  2. Zeller v. United States467 F. Supp. 487 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
  3. United Scottish Insurance v. United States614 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1979)
  4. Vera Zabala Clemente v. United States567 F.2d 1140 (1st Cir. 1978)
  5. Geo. Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc.463 F. Supp. 135 (D. Maryland 1979)
  6. Gelley v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.466 F. Supp. 182 (D. Minnesota 1979)

Most recent

  1. Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians ex rel. Francis v. New York278 F. Supp. 2d 313 (N.D.N.Y. 2003)
  2. Appley Bros. v. United States924 F. Supp. 944 (D.S.D. 1996)
  3. Marilyn Joyce Sellfors, Etc. v. United States697 F.2d 1362 (11th Cir. 1983)
  4. Bilderback v. United States558 F. Supp. 903 (D. Or. 1982)
  5. Butts Feed Lots, Inc., a Corporation v. United States690 F.2d 669 (8th Cir. 1982)
  6. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. City of Watertown529 F. Supp. 1220 (D.S.D. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 (1953) 1,528
United States v. Smith, 324 F.2d 622 (5th Cir. 1963) 60

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list