Arlice J. Huffman and John F. Burns v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Arlice J. HUFFMAN and John F. Burns, Petitioners-Appellants, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the denial of habeas corpus relief to two Texas prisoners, and denial of leave to proceed as a class action on behalf of themselves and “all others similarly situated.” Appellants contend that they were denied due process and equal protection of law when the Governor of Texas commuted their unconstitutional death sentences to 99 years imprisonment. In an appeal raising this same issue in an identical context, we have decided the question against the habeas corpus petitioner.
Sellars v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1976).
See Curry v. Estelle, 524 F.2d 981, 982 (5th Cir. 1975). The petitioners are incorrect in their argument that a fundamental constitutional right to resentencing before a jury has been abrogated.
Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19 , 96 S.Ct. 175 , 46 L.Ed.2d 162 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3277 (1975);
Ant- *1107 wine y.
Estelle, 486 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1115 , 94 S.Ct. 847 , 38 L.Ed.2d 742 (1973). Furthermore, there is no merit to the suggestion that the Governor’s action amounted to a bill of attainder.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.