Stanley Educational Methods, Inc. v. The Becker Cpa Review Course, Inc.
STANLEY EDUCATIONAL METHODS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the BECKER C.P.A. REVIEW COURSE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
On petition for rehearing, Stanley’s substitute counsel argues that the case should be decided under the theory of promissory estoppel.
See Wheeler v. White, 398 S.W.2d 93 (Tex.1965). This theory was not properly presented to the trial court for application to the facts, nor was it presented to this court until the unauthorized filing of substitute counsel’s supplemental brief. Under these circumstances, we ordinarily would not consider the new argument at the appellate level. However, we have examined the authorities cited in Stanley’s petition, especially Associated Tabulating Services, Inc. v. Olympic Life Insurance Co., 414 F.2d 1306 (5th Cir. 1969), and have found nothing in them to disturb our original conclusion that the actions of Becker were not undertaken with the intent to induce reliance on them by Stanley, without which promissory estoppel is no more applicable than equitable estoppel.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.