TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Attwood v. Gelbond

Attwood v. Gelbond.

Attwood v. Gelbond, 40 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 22, 1949
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
40 So. 2d 4581949 Fla. LEXIS 1381

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Action by Samuel Gelbond against J.K. Attwood and others, as the Board of Pharmacy for the State of Florida. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

Affirmed. On final hearing the Chancellor below held that the Board of Pharmacy of the State of Florida was without authority to deny or withhold from the appellee — under the peculiar facts appearing in the transcript — a certificate to practice pharmacy in the State of Florida. The defendant-appellant on this appeal contends that it has the optional authority under Section 465.02, F.S.A., to withhold from the appellee such certificate, although the appellee received an annual license to practice pharmacy in the State of New Jersey for some twenty odd years prior to the institution of this cause in the lower court. Emphasis in the argument was placed on a grade of the appellee of 55 on toxicology and an average grade of 70 1/2 on all other subjects. The New Jersey law requires an average grade of not less than 75 per cent and not less than 60 in any one subject and the New Jersey Board issued the appellee a certificate to practice pharmacy in New Jersey in the year 1921.

The appellants have not shown reversible error in the record.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

Addendum — Per Curiam

On Petition for Rehearing On rehearing granted this case has been thoroughly considered and a majority of the Court adhere to the per curiam order and opinion filed April 22, 1949.

Affirmed on rehearing.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

ADAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 11993: 119532026peak 1953 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Shein v. Attwood64 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1953)
  2. Lavernia v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATION, BD. OF MEDICINE616 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Most recent

  1. Lavernia v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATION, BD. OF MEDICINE616 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
  2. State ex rel. Shein v. Attwood64 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list