TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wang v. First Nat. Bank of Florala

Ed Wang, Minnie Wang and J. Duff Reeves, Appellants, v. First National Bank of Florala, a Corporation, Appellee

Wang v. First Nat. Bank of Florala, 110 So. 527 (Fla. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 24, 1926
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford
Citations
110 So. 52792 Fla. 974

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

In this case the Appellee brought suit to foreclose a mortgage on personal property, including crops.

*975 There was a demurrer filed to the bill of complaint. The bill of complaint contained allegations of equity and therefor the demurrer was properly overruled.

The decree is attacked upon the ground that it was not supported by the evidence.

The rulings of the Chancellor who tried the cause are presumed upon appeal to be correct and the burden is upon the Appellant to make it clearly to appear that such rulings are erroneous or the decree will be affirmed. (Jackson v. Jackson, 80 Fla. 557 ; 86 Sou. 510 , and cases there cited.)

The decree is affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11932: 11934: 11938: 21940: 119302026peak 1938 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Estate of Donne'ly v. Ashby188 So. 108 (Fla. 1938)
  2. Thomas v. Thompson155 So. 321 (Fla. 1934)
  3. Snedigar v. Keefer179 So. 421 (Fla. 1938)
  4. G. & L. Roofing Co. v. Thoma196 So. 414 (Fla. 1940)
  5. Gardiner v. Goertner149 So. 186 (Fla. 1932)
  6. Hatch v. Trabue128 So. 420 (Fla. 1930)

Most recent

  1. G. & L. Roofing Co. v. Thoma196 So. 414 (Fla. 1940)
  2. Estate of Donne'ly v. Ashby188 So. 108 (Fla. 1938)
  3. Snedigar v. Keefer179 So. 421 (Fla. 1938)
  4. Thomas v. Thompson155 So. 321 (Fla. 1934)
  5. Gardiner v. Goertner149 So. 186 (Fla. 1932)
  6. Hatch v. Trabue128 So. 420 (Fla. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Jackson v. Jackson, 86 So. 510 (Fla. 1920) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list