Ettinger v. Maas
Max Ettinger and Federal Realty Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Individually, and Doing Business as Federal Realty Company, Appellants, v. Catherina Maas, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
In this case the plaintiffs in error were the defendants in the court below and, upon judgment being rendered against them, they sued out writ of error.
Pleas to the declaration (if any were filed) do not appear in the transcript of the record and, therefore, this Court is not advised of the issues presented in the trial of the cause. For this reason the Court is not in position to determine whether or not' reversible error occurred in the trial and judgment. * When a record is presented in this condition the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.
*220 Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.