Barse v. Whaley
Fred W. Barse, Appellant, v. A. D. Whaley, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Farrell v. Forest Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191 , 74 South. Rep. 216 ; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783 , 78 South, Rep. 983; Smith v. O’Brien, 75 Fla. 252 , 78 South. Rep. 13 ; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309 , 87 South. Rep. 762 .; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 74 Fla. 539 , 77 South. Rep. 204 ; Burgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425 , 108 South. Rep. 169 .
Affirmed Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.