TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fox v. State

Ben Fox v. State

Fox v. State, 150 So. 228 (Fla. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 25, 1933
Judges
Brown, Buford, Davis, Whitfield
Citations
150 So. 228112 Fla. 1041933 Fla. LEXIS 2176

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

To an information charging a felony, the accused, apparently without understanding its import, offered a plea of nolo contendere, upon which a judgment of conviction and sentence to the State Prison was rendered. It does not appear that the accused was represented by counsel when the plea was filed. A motion to vacate the judgment and for leave to withdraw the plea of nolo contendere was supported by an affidavit of the accused that he had “never heard before of the word nolo contendere and did not know or understand its meaning, but was under the impression and believed that when he entered a plea that he was entering a plea of not guilty and that he did not *105 “intend to plead guilty,” but is innocent. The motion was denied. This was harmful error. Judgment reversed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11958: 11963: 11965: 11976: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Peel v. State150 So. 2d 281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  2. Thompson v. State342 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1976) · Concurrence
  3. Jordan v. State107 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
  4. Paul v. State73 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1954)
  5. State v. Bridgett210 A.2d 182 (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)

Most recent

  1. Thompson v. State342 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1976) · Concurrence
  2. State v. Bridgett210 A.2d 182 (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)
  3. Peel v. State150 So. 2d 281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  4. Jordan v. State107 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
  5. Paul v. State73 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list