TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Realty Co. v. Fraleigh-Smith Investment Co.

The Realty Company, Appellant, v. Fraleigh-Smith Investment Company, Appellee

Realty Co. v. Fraleigh-Smith Inv. Co., 107 So. 174 (Fla. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 4, 1925
Judges
Ellis, Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown
Citations
107 So. 17490 Fla. 769

Opinion of the Court — Ellis

Ellis, J.

This is a suit to' enforce a mortgage lien in favor of the Fraleigh-Smith Investment Company which exhibited its bill in the Circuit Court for Madison County against the mortgagor, the Realty Company, for that purpose. There was a demurrer to the bill. Later an amended bill was filed and a demurrer interposed to that. The demurrer was overruled and an appeal was taken from that order.

The order was signed by Honorable Daniel A. Simmons at Jasper, Florida, July 30, 1924, in open court.

This Court takes judicial notice that Honorable Mallory F. Horne ivas Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida on that date and that such Circuit included the counties of Madison and Hamilton in which latter county the city of Jasper is located. The Court also takes judicial notice that Honorable Daniel A. Simmons ivas Judge of the Circuit Court of Duval County on that date.

There is nothing in the record to show that by executive order the Honorable Daniel A. Simmons was acting as Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit for Madison or Hamilton County on the date the order was signed, nor that Honorable Mallory F. Horne because of illness, absence from the Circuit, or other cause was unable to act. See Article Y, Section 8, Constitution; Sections 2681-3057-3061, Revised General Statutes; Keen v. Polk, 72 Fla. 106 , 72 South. Rep. 788 ; Sewell v. Huffstetler, 83 Fla. 629 , 93 South. Rep. 162 .

The demurrer was filed July 3, 1924; the order overruling it was made July 30, 1924.

If Judge Simmons was holding court in the Third Circuit at Jasper upon an executive order the same should *771 have been entered of record in Madison County where this cause was pending, and should have been made to appear by the record in this case.

The record contains a statement that no such executive assignment or order is on record in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Madison County. If there was such an executive order on record in Hamilton County we cannot presume that Judge Horne was unable to act in Madison County where the cause was pending, or that the parties by consent agreed to submit the demurrer to Judge Simmons at Jasper in Hamilton County on account of such inability of Judge Horne to act.

Other assignments of error are considered to be without merit. The matter of the amount actually due upon the promissory note, regardless of the amount alleged to be due in the bill, will be determined by the evidence submitted before the special master or examiner, to take testimony. The bill with the exhibits, which are by appropriate language made part of it, is sufficiently definite as to the place at which the note was payable.

For the reason assigned the order overruling the demurrer is void and the cause is hereby remanded for appropriate proceedings.

Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11931: 11932: 11935: 11940: 11949: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Forcum, Receiver v. Symmes133 So. 88 (Fla. 1931)
  2. State ex rel. Sedillo v. Anderson210 P.2d 626 (N.M. 1949)
  3. Stearns v. Stearns143 So. 642 (Fla. 1932)
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Tucker159 So. 787 (Fla. 1935) · Concurrence
  5. Johns v. State197 So. 791 (Fla. 1940)
  6. Seaboard Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Railway108 So. 675 (Fla. 1926)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Sedillo v. Anderson210 P.2d 626 (N.M. 1949)
  2. Johns v. State197 So. 791 (Fla. 1940)
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Tucker159 So. 787 (Fla. 1935) · Concurrence
  4. Stearns v. Stearns143 So. 642 (Fla. 1932)
  5. Forcum, Receiver v. Symmes133 So. 88 (Fla. 1931)
  6. Seaboard Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Railway108 So. 675 (Fla. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Sewell v. Huffstetler, 93 So. 162 (Fla. 1922) 19
Lanis v. Ill. Cent. R. Co., 72 So. 788 (La. 1916) 17
Keen v. Polk, 72 Fla. 106 (1916) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list