TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nelson v. Franklin

P. C. Nelson v. James M. Franklin

Nelson v. Franklin, 12 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 6, 1943
Judges
Terrell, Buford, Chapman, Adams
Citations
12 So. 2d 771152 Fla. 6941943 Fla. LEXIS 1006

Opinion of the Court — Terrell

TERRELL, J.:

P. C. Nelson married Etta Franklin in 1934. Both had children by former marriages. They lived for several years in. the home of P. C. Nelson and then moved to the home of Etta Franklin Nelson where they lived until her death in 1941. Prior to her death, she willed this home to her son James M. Franklin by her former marriage.

P. C. Nelson as the surviving husband brought this suit for partition and division of the said home. On final hearing, *695 the chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint and Nelson appealed.

Nelson predicated his right to partition on the ground that his wife was the head of the family, that the home in question was the homestead of the family and could not be alienated by will or deed and that it descended to him and appellee equally from Etta Franklin Nelson.

The chancellor rejected these contentions. It is quite true that the wife may in fact be the head of the family in which event she could not by will of otherwise alienate the homestead but in this case no such showing is made. . The home in question was the separate property of Etta Franklin Nelson, was owned by her and her former husband by the entireties, and she was at liberty to will it to the son of that marriage. We do not overlook the fact that homestead exemption was claimed in the home in question and in the home of appellant where they first lived, but that did not affect the status of the properties. Appellant was the head of the family and was living in the wife’s house at the time of her death.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 11954: 11960: 21982: 11984: 119492026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Doing v. Riley176 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949)
  2. William Joseph Manda, Bankrupt v. Don C. Sinclair, Trustee278 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1960)
  3. In re Hersch23 B.R. 42 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1982)
  4. Abernathy v. Gruppo119 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
  5. Stephens v. Campbell70 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1954) · Dissent
  6. In re Gottling42 B.R. 386 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984)

Most recent

  1. In re Gottling42 B.R. 386 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984)
  2. In re Hersch23 B.R. 42 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1982)
  3. William Joseph Manda, Bankrupt v. Don C. Sinclair, Trustee278 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1960)
  4. Abernathy v. Gruppo119 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
  5. Stephens v. Campbell70 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1954) · Dissent
  6. Doing v. Riley176 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list