Cravatt v. Pierson
C. M. Cravatt, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. Pierson, Defendant in Error
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel.
Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 , 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389 , 54 South. Rep. 452 ; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197 , 97 South. Rep. 380 , and State ex rel.
Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55 , 100 South. Rep. 796 . Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91 , Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —.
An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.