TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dewhurst v. City of St. Augustine

William W. Dewhurst, Appellant, v. the City of St. Augustine, Florida, a Body Politic and Corporate, and C. G. Oldfather, Acting as City Auditor of the City of St. Augustine, Appellees

Dewhurst v. City of St. Augustine, 107 So. 689 (Fla. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 23, 1926
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Brown, Ellis
Citations
107 So. 68991 Fla. 3141926 Fla. LEXIS 906

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

— In a suit praying for the cancellation of tax sale certificates held by the city for unpaid city taxes, upon grounds of alleged illegality in the assessments upon which the tax certificates are predicated, the court on final hearing dismissed the bill of complaint and an appeal was taken by the complainant.

Even if the allegations of illegality of the tax sale certificates held by the city may be regarded as duly sustained by the law and the evidence, yet it is apaprent that the complainant, appellant here, has not paid the taxes that may be legally due upon the property covered by the alleged invalid certificates, and as the complainant has not offered to do, but should do equity before he can invoke the aid of equity for the relief he seeks, it is considered, ordered and decreed that the decree herein be reversed pro forma and the cause remanded with dirctions to permit the parties by stipulation or other proper procedure to determine the amount of taxes that could legally have been assessed against the property and have not been paid, and that upon proof of the payment of such taxes the proper certificates shall be ordered cancelled; and if the taxes are not paid the bill of complaint shall be dismissed. The costs of this appeal will be taxed equally against the appellant and appellee city.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J. Concur.

Brown, C. J. and Ellis, J. Concur in the opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 11939: 11941: 31955: 11963: 119332026peak 1941 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City of Fort Myers v. Heitman5 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1941)
  2. City of Fort Myers v. Heitman4 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1941)
  3. Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty152 So. 439 (Fla. 1933)
  4. Adams v. Fielding4 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1941)
  5. Dade County Land Development Corp. v. Dade County157 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  6. Thompson v. City of Key West82 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Dade County Land Development Corp. v. Dade County157 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  2. Thompson v. City of Key West82 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1955)
  3. City of Fort Myers v. Heitman5 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1941)
  4. Adams v. Fielding4 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1941)
  5. City of Fort Myers v. Heitman4 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1941)
  6. City of Tampa v. Wiley188 So. 134 (Fla. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list