Hodella v. State
Ruby Jean Hodella v. State of Florida
Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, J.:
Appellant being informed against for the crime of murder in the second degree, was convicted of manslaughter and perfected her appeal to this court.
The burden of appellant’s contention is that the evidence showed that the appellant was either guilty of murder in the first degree or guilty of nothing more than justifiable homicide.
We entertain the view that the evidence was sufficient to have sustained a conviction of murder in the first degree and it, therefore, was sufficient to sustain a conviction of any lesser degree of unlawful homicide. See Ammons v. State, 88 Fla. 444 , 102 So. 642 ; Morrison v. State, 42 Fla. 149 , 28 So. 97 ; Owens v. State, 65 Fla. 483 , 62 So. 651 ; Stone v. State, 57 Fla. 28 , 48 So. 996 ; Dedge v. State, 68 Fla. 240 , 67 So. 43 ; Johnson v. State, 24 Fla. 162 , 4 So. 535 , approved and distinguished in Marshall v. State, 32 Fla. 462 , 14 So. 92 ; Brown v. State, 31 Fla. 207 , 12 So. 640 .
No reversible error being made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.
CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, J., and BARNS, Circuit Judge, concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.