TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clark v. Clark

Albert M. Clark v. Simone Fournier Clark

Clark v. Clark, 20 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 1945)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 20, 1945
Judges
Chapman, Brown, Thomas, Sebring
Citations
20 So. 2d 900155 Fla. 5741945 Fla. LEXIS 586

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is a petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 34 to review an order made by the circuit judge upon a petition for temporary allowances for support, attorney’s fees and court costs in a case wherein the wife had filed a bill against the husband for a separate maintenance and support and for attorney’s fees, and wherein the defendant husband had filed an answer and counter claim for divorce. The wife’s petition for alimony pendente lite and for attorney’s fees, etc., came on for hearing before the circuit judge on January 26, 1945 and he announced his conclusions at that time but the formal order was not drawn and filed until the following Monday, January 29.

In considering matters of this kind, the amount of alimony, suit money, etc., should be determined with due regard to the necessities of the wife and the financial ability of the husband. Collins v. Collins, 153 Fla. 10 , 13 So. (2nd) 445 . Applying this rule it seems to us that the chancellor was entirely too generous in his allowances. Neither side offered any testimony as to what sums would be reasonable to allow, but there was evidence as to the financial ability of the husband and the needs of the wife. The merits of this case have yet to be decided. Meanwhile, our view is that temporary alimony of $100.00 a week ought to be the maximum sum allowed at the present time subject to such modifications, either up or down as may be shown as necessary by future developments and appropriate testimony; also that the allowances for “temporary”, counsel fees should not at this time exceed $1000.00.

It is the function of this Court to determine the amount of attorney’s fees for services rendered'the defendant wife in this Court against this petition for certiorari. In view of the cost of travel and the time consumed we will allow counsel for *576 the respondent a fee of $300.00.’ It appears that he has already been paid $500.00 as required by the chancellor’s' order and the extra $200.00 can be credited on the $1000.00 temporary counsel’s fee.

The writ of certiorari is granted and the order of the court below is quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion.

• CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1965: 11991: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robbie v. Robbie591 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  2. Anderson v. Anderson180 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Most recent

  1. Robbie v. Robbie591 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  2. Anderson v. Anderson180 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Collins v. Collins, 13 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1943) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list