Hornsby v. State
J. A. Hornsby, Appellant, v. State, Appellee
Hornsby v. State, 200 So. 541 (Fla. 1941)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.
It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be— Affirmed.
Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.