Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Kirkland
Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Company, a Corporation, Appellant, v. J. Ham Kirkland Et Ux., Appellees
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Bill of Complaint' was filed seeking to cancel and have declared null and void a certain conveyance on the ground of fraud. Answer was filed and testimony taken before a master. The chancellor found in favor of the defendants and dismissed the bill.
Questions of fact only are presented by the assignments of error. There is ample evidence to sustain the decree and the case is well within the familiar principle that the findings of the chancellor on the facts will not' be disturbed by an appellate court unless such findings are clearly shown to be erroneous. Kreher v. Morley, 84 Fla. 121 , 92 So. R. 686; Smith v. Dowling 81 Fla. 867 , 89 So. R. 315; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309 , 87 So. R. 762; Commercial Bank of Ocala v. First National Bank, 80 Fla. 685 , 87 So. R. 315; Hill v. Beacham, 79 Fla. 430 , 85 So. R. 147. Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 82 , 95 So. R. 302; Edney v. Stinson, 90 Fla. 335 , 105 So. R. 821; Birgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425 , 108 So. R. 169; Lluis v. Lluis, 91 Fla. 706 , 108 So. R. 671.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.