TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atwood v. McRae

Jennie Mae Atwood, Appellant, vs. Floyd W. McRae, Appellee

Atwood v. McRae, 133 So. 892 (Fla. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 21, 1931
Judges
Buford, Wi-Iitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Davis
Citations
133 So. 892101 Fla. 277

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Brown are of opinion that the orders of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the orders should be reversed. "When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel.

Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 , 37 South. Rep. 51 , that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 (1904) 173
Griffith v. Alcocke, 37 So. 47 (La. 1904) 94

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list