TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kubie v. the Honorable Ross Williams

RALPH KUBIE, Individually and Trading as “Ralph’s Jewelry Store”, v. THE HONORABLE ROSS WILLIAMS, Et Al., as Judge of Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, and KARLSBAD CORPORATION, a Corporation

Kubie v. the Honorable Ross Williams, 31 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1947)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 10, 1947
Judges
Buford, Thomas, Terrell, Adams
Citations
31 So. 2d 44159 Fla. 801947 Fla. LEXIS 686

Opinion of the Court — Buford

BUFORD, J.:

This is the second appearance of this case here. On its former appearance it was on petition for prohibition and the writ was awarded. Kubie v. Karlsbad Corporation, et al., 158 Fla. 390 , 28 So.2d 686 .

The suit was initiated as a statutory action by the landlord to oust the tenant who was alleged to have unlawfully held possession of the demised premises after the expiration of his lease and after demand for possession by the landlord.

Such proceedings are controlled by Chapter 83 Florida Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.). The privilege of appeal from orders granting new trial after verdict must be authorized by statute. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Hayes, 66 Fla. 589 , 64 So. 274 ; Zeigler v. Erler Corp., 102 Fla. 981 , 136 So. 718 .

Section 83.27 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.) governs appeals from orders made on motions for new trial and it limits the privilege of appeal to review orders denying new trial. This is done so that the losing party will not lose his privilege of review by filing motion for new trial and in effect the result is the review of final judgment.

On authority of our opinion and judgment in Kubie v. Karlsbad Corporation, et al., certiorari is granted and the *81 order of the Circuit Court is quashed with directions that the appeal be dismissed.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Metropolitan Dade County v. Mingo339 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Metropolitan Dade County v. Mingo339 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. v. Hayes, 64 So. 274 (Fla. 1914) 49
Zigler, Admrx. v. Erler Corp., 136 So. 718 (Fla. 1931) 13
Kubie v. Karlsbad Corp., 28 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 1947) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list