TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gollnick v. James

E. M. Gollnick and Anna E. Gollnick, His Wife, Appellants, v. Walter James, Appellee

Gollnick v. James, 115 So. 529 (Fla. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1928
Judges
Buford, Whitfield, Terrell
Citations
115 So. 52994 Fla. 1231

Opinion of the Court — Buford

*1232 Buford, J.

This is an appeal from order overruling a general demurrer to an amended bill of complaint in a suit in which the complainant in the court below sought to recover the sum of $1,000.00 paid under an executory contract to purchase certain lands from the defendants in the court below, and to have decreed a lien on the property embraced in the contract. It was alleged that a breach of the contract had occurred on the part of the defendants by reason of the failure of the vendors, who were the defendants in the court below, to comply with that condition of the contract contained in the following language:

“The seller is to furnish an abstract showing his title to be good and merchantable, but in the event that the title shall not be found good and merchantable, the seller agrees to use reasonable diligence to make the said title good and merchantable, and shall have a reasonable time so to do, and if after reasonable diligence on his part said title shall not be made good and merchantable within a reasonable time, the seller may, at his option, return the money this day paid and all moneys that may have been paid to him under this contract, and thereupon he shall be released from all obligations hereunder. ’ ’

The order overruling the demurrer should be affirmed on authority of the opinions in the cases of Barclay v. Bank of Osceola County, 82 Fla. 72 , 89 Sou. 357 ; Musselwhite v. Olson, 60 Fla. 342 , 53 Sou. 944 , and Wheeler v. Sullivan, 90 Fla. 711 , 106 Sou. 876 , and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 21931: 11932: 11943: 119302026peak 1930 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Adams v. Whittle135 So. 152 (Fla. 1931)
  2. John Ringling Estates, Inc. v. White141 So. 884 (Fla. 1932)
  3. Allen v. Bowman10 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1943)
  4. Atlantic Mortgage & Finance Co. v. Hamilton40 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1930)
  5. Leesburg State Bank v. Lyle126 So. 791 (Fla. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Allen v. Bowman10 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1943)
  2. John Ringling Estates, Inc. v. White141 So. 884 (Fla. 1932)
  3. Adams v. Whittle135 So. 152 (Fla. 1931)
  4. Atlantic Mortgage & Finance Co. v. Hamilton40 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1930)
  5. Leesburg State Bank v. Lyle126 So. 791 (Fla. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Barclay v. Bank of Osceola Cnty., 89 So. 357 (Fla. 1921) 12
Wheeler v. Sullivan, 90 Fla. 711 (1925) 29
Musselwhite v. Oleson, 60 Fla. 342 (1910) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list