TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Douglass

L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc., v. W. B. Douglass, as Chairman, and a Member Of, Eugene S. Matthews, as a Member Of, and Jerry W. Carter, as a Member Of, and Jointly and Severally Composing the Florida Railroad Commission

L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Douglass, 169 So. 501 (Fla. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 16, 1936
Judges
Davis, Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford
Citations
169 So. 501124 Fla. 8191936 Fla. LEXIS 1201

Opinion of the Court — Davis

Davis, J.

While a motor common carrier claiming bona fide the benefits of sub-paragraph (b) of Section 206 of the Federal Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (Title 49, U. S. Code Annotated, Sections 301 to 327, both inclusive, 49 U. S. Statutes 543), to continue its already begun interstate commerce haulage operations until its pending application to the Interstate Commerce Commission for a permanent Certificate of Convenience and Necessity has been heard, considered and decided pursuant to applicable United States statutes and regulations, possesses a Federal Statutory right amounting to a Federal status that is entitled to legal and equitable protection in appropriate litigation (L.&L. Freight Lines, Inc., v. Florida Railroad Commission, 124 Fla. 579 , 169 Sou. Rep. 370 ), yet such Federal right is of transient and temporary character only until the permanent status of the applicant under subparagraph (b) of Section 206, supra, has been duly investigated and finally decided by the Interstate Commerce Commission according to applicable United States law, so there is no duty on the Florida Railroad Commission to grant its own Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the interstate operation involved until after the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States has finally decided the permanent status of the applicant under Federal law.

Therefore the alternative writ of mandamus in this case is denied, without prejudice, however, to the right of the relator to renew its application if and when its permanent status under the Federal, 1935, Motor Common Carrier Act has been finally decided.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 119372026peak 1937 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Rd. Commission of Texas v. Bates108 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Rd. Commission of Texas v. Bates108 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App. 1937)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Douglass, 169 So. 389 (Fla. 1936) 5
L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Douglass, 169 So. 370 (Fla. 1936) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list