Skipper v. Handley
G. B. Skipper, Et Al., Appellants, v. Robert Handley, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The orders herein appealed from were reversed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114 , 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140 , 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279 , 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621 , 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore considered, ordered and de *1257 creed that the former decree herein reversing the orders appealed from is vacated and it is now ordered and decreed that the orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Ellis and Buford, J. J., dissent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.