TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Zysk v. Woodruff

State Ex Rel. Walter Zysk v. C. J. Woodruff, as Chief of Police of the City of Tampa, a Municipality, Etc.

State ex rel. Zysk v. Woodruff, 2 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 27, 1941
Judges
Terrell, Brown, Whitfield, Buford, Chapman, Thomas
Citations
2 So. 2d 578147 Fla. 302

Opinion of the Court — Terrell

Terrell, J.

The records and the briefs in this case have been examined and the questions raised found to be identical with those raised in State ex rel William Hough v. C. J. Woodruff, decided this date, so the petitioner is discharged on authority of last cited case.

Whitfield, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

*303 Brown, C. J., and Thomas, J., dissents.

Dissent — Thomas

Thomas, J.

(dissenting). — I am unable to agree with the opinion of a majority of the Court because I feel that there is no basis in the record for a writ of habeas corpus.

Brown, C. J., concurs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 11952: 11970: 21971: 119482026peak 1970 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Canal Authority v. Litzel243 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1970)
  2. Canal Authority v. Miller243 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1970)
  3. Orange County v. Fordham34 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1948)
  4. Monongahela Power Co. v. Shackelford73 S.E.2d 809 (W. Va. 1952)
  5. Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc.248 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc.248 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
  2. Canal Authority v. Miller243 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1970)
  3. Canal Authority v. Litzel243 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1970)
  4. Monongahela Power Co. v. Shackelford73 S.E.2d 809 (W. Va. 1952)
  5. Orange County v. Fordham34 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1948)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list