TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Howarth v. Jordan

State of Florida Ex Rel. Casper Howarth, Relator, vs. Saml. D. Jordan, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Volusia County, Florida, Respondent

State ex rel. Howarth v. Jordan, 140 So. 908 (Fla. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 22, 1932
Judges
Bueord
Citations
140 So. 908105 Fla. 322

Opinion of the Court — Bueord

Bueord, C.J.

This ease is before us on petition for writ of mandamus wherein it is sought by the Relator to compel the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Volusia County to accept filing fee of $18.00 to qualify the Relator as a candidate for the office of County Commissioner of Volusia County.

The petition shows that the Clerk of the Circuit Court is demanding of the Relator the sum of $54.00 as a filing fee to qualify for such office and that the Clerk of the Circuit Court is acting under the provisions of Chapter 14680, Laws of Fla., Acts of 1931, which fixes the salary of the county commissioners of Volusia County at $1800.00 per annum.

The Relator contends that the chapter above referred to is a Special Law fixing the salary of officers and that the same is in violation of section 20 of Article III of the Constitution of Florida because the General Law of *323 Florida fixes the saláries of county commissioners at $600.00 per annum.

Mandamus may not be invoked to require an officer to perform a certain act, unless it appears that it is clearly the duty of the officer to perform such act.

Chapter 14680, supra, purports to fix the salaries of the members of the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County and the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Volusia County is without authority to hold the Act inoperative or invalid. See State ex rel. A. C. L. R. R. Co. vs. The Board of Equalizers of Fla., 84 Fla. 592 , 94 Sou. 681 .

The petition of the Relator fails to show that he has such an interest in the subject matter of chapter 14680, supra, as to place him in the status of one having the right to contest the constitutionality of that Act.

For the reasons stated, the petition for mandamus should be denied and it is so ordered.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1932: 11934: 11935: 11936: 31938: 21940: 11945: 11946: 11950: 11954: 21970: 11977: 11982: 119322026peak 1936 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Juvenal v. Neville167 So. 650 (Fla. 1936)
  2. White v. Crandon156 So. 303 (Fla. 1934) · Dissent
  3. Gaulden v. Kirk47 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1950)
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. Baker21 N.W.2d 355 (N.D. 1945)
  5. State ex rel. West v. Gray74 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1954)
  6. State ex rel. Haft v. Adams238 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1970)

Most recent

  1. Smith v. Willis415 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
  2. State ex rel. McGuirk v. Cowart344 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
  3. State ex rel. Haft v. Adams238 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1970)
  4. State ex rel. West v. Gray74 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1954)
  5. State ex rel. West v. Gray70 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1954) · Concurrence
  6. Gaulden v. Kirk47 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. Bd. of Equalizers, 84 Fla. 592 (1922) 70

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list