Davis v. State
Coleman Davis, Ted Truitt and R. v. Helms, Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Plaintiffs in error were convicted' of the larceny of a cow. The contention made in their behalf is that there was no evidence of “taking and carrying away.” There was, however, sufficient evidence to show that the cow was butchered at the place where she was shot, and the operations necessary to prepare the beef for market.
*988 almost completed, when the plaintiffs in error were discovered and ran away. The judgment of conviction is affirmed on authority of Driggers v. State, 118 So. R. 20.
Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.