TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Heisen v. Coghill

Charles C. Heisen, Appellant, v. William W. Coghill and Lula F. Coghill, His Wife, Appellees

Heisen v. Coghill, 128 So. 35 (Fla. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 5, 1930
Judges
Whitfield, Strum, Buford
Citations
128 So. 3599 Fla. 1021

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list