United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff
Opinion
542 F.2d 521
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Laura Elena ESQUER-RIVERA, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anacleto NAVA-BIBAYOFF, Appellant.
Nos. 74-1110, 74-1099.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 20, 1976.
1
Michael J. McCabe (argued), of Federal Defenders, San Diego, Cal., for appellants.
2
James W. Meyers (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
3
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * District Judge.
4
The court now being fully advised, the petition for rehearing filed July 24, 1975, is allowed; the opinion filed July 1, 1974 ( 500 F.2d 313 ), is withdrawn; and the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074 , 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), reversing 514 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1975).
* The Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.