TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bennett v. George A. Barker

B. D. Bennett, Et Al., as Board of Trustees of Special Tax School District No. 6, Orange County, Et Al., v. George A. Barker, Et Al., and W. H. Dresch, as Board of Public Instruction, Orange County

Bennett v. Barker, 156 So. 437 (Fla. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 6, 1934
Judges
Davis, Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford
Citations
156 So. 437116 Fla. 386

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of the relators for a peremptory writ of mandamus herein and it appearing to the Court that an order has been heretofore entered in this cause sustaining the demurrer of *387 the relators to the return of the respondents and no sufficient application to amend the return or to take further proceedings having been made by the respondents, in consequence of which relators are entitled to a' final judgment against the respondents on their said demurrer, it is thereupon considered, ordered and adjudged that the relators herein do- have judgment against the respondents herein on their said demurrer and that a peremptory writ of mandamus do issue herein in accordance with the alternative writ of mandamus as amended and that relators do have and recover of and from the respondents their costs in this cause to be taxed by the Clerk.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1934: 11937: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Waldron v. Wilkinson158 So. 703 (Fla. 1934)
  2. Revell v. State ex rel. Howard177 So. 623 (Fla. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Revell v. State ex rel. Howard177 So. 623 (Fla. 1937)
  2. State ex rel. Waldron v. Wilkinson158 So. 703 (Fla. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list